<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Police Stuff</title>
		<link>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/-t1.htm</link>
		<description>Protecting, serving, beating the crap out of us while raiding the wrong house....</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:13:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>4th Amendment and New Police Profesionalism</title>
			<link>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/4th-amendment-and-new-police-profesionalism-t76.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>renodraws</dc:creator>
			<description>As we all should know, the 4th Amendment protects our right to be free of unreasonable search and sezuires.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

As we know the consitution does not stand on it's own.  ...</description>
			<category>Police Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/4th-amendment-and-new-police-profesionalism-t76.htm#111</comments>
			<guid>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/4th-amendment-and-new-police-profesionalism-t76.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Police Brutality</title>
			<link>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/police-brutality-t37.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>renodraws</dc:creator>
			<description>NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – In a survey of a random sample of U.S. emergency physicians, virtually all said they believed that law enforcement officers use excessive force to arrest and detain suspects.

The sample included 315 respondents. While 99.8 percent believed excessive force is used, almost as many (97.8 percent) reported that they had managed cases that they suspected or that the patient stated had involved excessive use of force by law enforcement officers.

Nearly two thirds (65.3  ...</description>
			<category>Police Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:57:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/police-brutality-t37.htm#46</comments>
			<guid>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/police-brutality-t37.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Prosecutor - Justice or Convictions?</title>
			<link>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/prosecutor-justice-or-convictions-t19.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>renodraws</dc:creator>
			<description> It is often a question of what our district attorney's and other prosecutors' goals are. Convicting someone and providing justice can be two very different outcomes. When a DA ignores or covers up exonerating evidence it does not bode well for our justice system. As with any other job, the metrics that you are graded on drives your actions. A DA does not get a plus for releasing innocent people or reopening cases that have new evidence. The only way an assistant DA gets the top job or a DA become  ...</description>
			<category>Police Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/prosecutor-justice-or-convictions-t19.htm#19</comments>
			<guid>http://5sidedcube.forumotion.net/police-stuff-f5/prosecutor-justice-or-convictions-t19.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>